(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.07.06 2017가단27022

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.07.06 2017가단27022

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 12,178,064 and this shall apply thereto.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 14, 2017, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 3,630,000 (in addition, the additional tax is paid in advance on March 21, 201) and the lease period from March 21, 2017 to March 20, 2019 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. According to Article 4 of the instant lease agreement, the lessor may terminate the instant lease agreement immediately if the lessee’s overdue overdue interest reaches the amount of two-term rents.

B. The Defendant paid only the rent in March 2017 and April 2017, and did not pay the rent thereafter.

C. On August 24, 2017, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that “the instant lease agreement is terminated as the Defendant did not pay monthly rent at least three times in arrears.”

On September 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) notified the Plaintiff of the demand notice following the late payment of rent on August 7, 2017; and (b) received the notification of the termination of the lease agreement and the notification of the guidance to specify the object of the lease on August 24, 2017; and (c) agreed that the lessor shall extend the period until September 30, 2017 pursuant to the preceding paragraph; (d) the fixed date of the name of the building ( September 30, 2017), and (e) did not sublease the instant real estate to a third party; and (vi) did not comply with the name limit ( September 30, 2017), thereby applying 15% per annum to the Plaintiff’s statutory interest rate due to the delay in the name of the building; and (vii) prepared and deliver a letter of performance to the Plaintiff that “the Plaintiff shall settle the cost of the construction and bear the expense of the attorney’s actual expenses.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-4 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination of the parties' arguments

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease agreement around September 1, 2017.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2020.02.14 2019가단136789

-창원지방법원 2020.06.30 2019가단104764

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.17 2018나29602

-청주지방법원충주지원 2020.08.12 2019가단4123

-대전지방법원 2018.05.02 2017가단24233