A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Chungcheong District Court branch on December 18, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court on May 10, 2010.

1. Around December 21, 2014, the Defendant was driving a DNA clock vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.122% in a section of about 300 meters from the front of the mid-term office in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the direction of the voice of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the front road in the same group B, from around 300 meters to the front road in the same group.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) by the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle of DCrlar.

On December 8, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on the 21:15th day of December, 2014, and driven the two-lane road in the C front of the Haak-gun B, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant driven the two-lane road at the speed below the speed.

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center is installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly drive the vehicle throughout the front-time and to safely drive the vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was in the front part of the left-hand side of the car driving by the victim E, who was under normal process at the front of the front-hand side of the car driving by the Defendant, due to the negligent negligence of the center line running along the station line, and was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take any measures against the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business as seen above, while destroying the above Cost of repair, such as the exchange of the front offender, etc., and neglecting the Defendant’s vehicle driving on the road as it is, but did not take any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A traffic accident;