logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.08 2015고단5602
위증
Text

As to the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, a fine of KRW 3,000,00 shall be imposed on the crime No. 2 in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court on December 18, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 26, 2015.

1. On January 28, 2015, the Defendant was present at the court of Incheon District Court No. 317 located in 163, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-ro, 163, as a witness of a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) against the above court No. 2014 high 751 C, and testified following the prosecutor’s testimony on January 18, 2015.

The testimony was made as shown in attached Table 1, such as answering the answer to the question "", as the case may be.

However, there was no fact that the defendant had met C around November 8, 2013 at the Incheon Airport.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant was present at the court of Incheon District Court No. 317, located on April 16, 2015, 16:00 in Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, 163, 163, as a witness of a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) against the above court No. 2014 Gohap 751, and testified after the testimony of the defense counsel in the following: (a) the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was asked to the Incheon International Airport Corporation if the witness was sent to the Incheon Airport in November 2013.

The question of how to see the fact-finding) is “(1).............”

The testimony was made in the same manner as the attached Table 2 of the sight of crimes, such as the reply to "."

However, there was no fact that the defendant had met C around November 8, 2013 at the Incheon Airport.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the second public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each protocol of examination of witness;

1. Application of statutes (2014 Gohap751);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow