logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.05.20 2016고단388
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 1,00,000, and Defendant C’s fine of KRW 5,000,00, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the industrial chain C(State), Defendant B is the production director of the foregoing company, Defendant C is the company that manufactures scambling scam, and scambling scams made of swine scams in Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi-do and sells food production in F in the event of Gyeonggi-do at the convenience store for school near Seoul, Incheon, and middle and high schools.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B

(a) No one shall display, keep, or sell any product, the expiration of the distribution period of which expires, for sale, or use such product for manufacturing or processing food, etc.;

Nevertheless, the Defendants re-packageded a stone food hambur and sold it with freezing food for six months or more, and conspired with other equipment for profit. On May 19, 2015, the Defendants re-produced one thousand five hundred and five hundred and five hundred and five hundred and five hundred won per unit by opening a package of a stone food hambur in which the distribution deadline has elapsed at the above place and extending the distribution deadline to six months.

(b) No indication or advertisement of any false content shall be made with respect to the indication of the date of manufacture, the date of manufacture, or the distribution deadline;

Defendants, on September 4, 2015 and September 11, 2015, processed 17,280 hambs, including “G, H, I, J, and K5 kinds,” at the above location, and are scheduled to deliver the manufacturing date of the packaging to the distributor.

9.6.

9. 13. Each mark made a false marking of manufacturing date.

2. Defendant C (State) committed an act in violation of the duty as described in paragraph (1) by an employee A and B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. A statement of reasons for the establishment of each distribution deadline;

1. A report on manufacturing items of each food item;

1. Business registration certificate and business registration certificate;

1. Investigation report by the prosecution (verification of the quantity of false products with a distribution deadline);

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of criminal defendant A and defendant B concerning criminal facts, respectively;

arrow