A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2011, the Defendant issued, at the Gwangju District Court, a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and at the same court on January 3, 2013, a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act was issued.

On June 21, 2013, the Defendant was punished twice as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was driving a B-hurd-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Investigation Report (as regards the application of the Tradmark):

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of court rulings related to A's records of drinking alcohol driving), and application of two copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although it is necessary to punish a criminal defendant with severe punishment for the crime of drinking-driving, which is repeated by the defendant, such as a criminal record before drinking-driving in the judgment of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the sentence of probation is to be rendered on condition that an order to attend a lecture is given only once in consideration of all the circumstances of sentencing.