logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.03.30 2017나59061
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Trust 1 of the instant land, officetels, etc.) D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Execution Company”).

) The Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and four parcels (hereinafter “the instant land”).

) Ftel to be constructed on the ground (hereinafter “the instant officetel”) is the instant officetel’s “the instant officetel”;

(2) On March 23, 2012, the International Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “International Asset Trust Co., Ltd.”) is called “Trust Co., Ltd.”; hereinafter “Trust”) in the course of carrying out the business of selling in lots.

B) Between this case’s land, the instant officetel constructed on its ground, and the instant instant officetel and sales proceeds in trust, and the trust company shall manage the sales proceeds deposited in the account of sales proceeds and manage the sales proceeds in trust and transfer the ownership of an officetel sold in lots to the buyer who fully pays the sales proceeds. The trust agreement for sales management (hereinafter “the instant trust agreement”) is “the instant trust agreement.

2) On March 23, 2012, the Company concluded a registration of transfer of ownership based on the same day trust, and the trust contract of this case was publicly announced in the original trust register.

B. 1) Defendant B is a licensed real estate agent operating the instant G real estate, and Defendant C is a brokerage assistant. Defendant B notified Defendant C of the acquisition of the instant officetel at a discount on the ownership of the executory company around March 2015, and notified the Plaintiff that he would pay a certain percentage of the commission paid to the executor and the buyer upon recruitment of the buyer. The Defendant C introduced the instant officetel sales to the Plaintiff, who was found in the said G real estate, and announced the Plaintiff to the executory office. 2) The Plaintiff did not hear the explanation on the instant trust agreement from the Defendants or the executor’s employees on April 27, 2015, while the Plaintiff did not hear the explanation on the instant trust agreement from the Defendants or the executor’s employees on April 27, 2015, the instant officetel 342 supply amount to KRW 79,300,000, the actual sales price, and 53,000.

arrow