beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant B is a clan consisting of adult men and women residing in the Gunsan-si, Sosan-si, and Kim Jong-si, which jointly set up P, and the Plaintiff was the vice-chairperson of Defendant B.
B. The Republic of Korea: (a) Q forest was divided into nine parcels, including the R Forest in the Hasan City, and the R Forest in the Hasan City was divided into eight parcels, including R or S, in the Hasan City; and (b) among them, the F Forest in the Hasan City was converted into the E Forest in the Hasan City in the Hasan City, and the registration conversion was divided into two parcels, E and Hasan City in the Hasan City in the Hasan City.
C. On June 9, 2007, among Defendant B, the Plaintiff held an emergency board of directors on June 9, 2007, and the parcel number of Defendant B’s F registration conversion D, the ownership of Defendant B, and the F registration conversion in the following cities, the following cities: Hasan-si, and Hasan-si, the land number of which was expropriated in the
A resolution was made with the effect that forest land (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant real estate”) will be paid in kind (hereinafter referred to as “instant resolution by the board of directors”). D.
On November 13, 2009, I and the Defendants deposited KRW 662,389,210 of the expropriation compensation money as the deposit amount of No. 2275 of the Jeonju District Court in 2009, on the ground that there was a dispute over the ownership of the land to be expropriated in the name of I among the land located in the land in the project site in the T business site, namely, 15/16 of the equity shares in the name of I among the land located in the land in the project site.
E. Defendant B filed a lawsuit against I and Defendant C, seeking confirmation of the status of the person with the right to receive payment of the above deposit money deposited by the Seoul District Court No. 2275 in 2009 for the expropriation compensation deposited by Defendant C and then confirmed that the above right to claim payment of the deposit money is against Defendant B.