beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
1. On July 5, 2007, the Defendant subscribed to “five insurance products” by the victim interesting country life insurance company, and attempted to keep formal hospitalization by means of exaggeration of symptoms to receive insurance money, and to obtain insurance money by fraud by claiming insurance money from the victim, with the content that insurance money of KRW 50,000 through KRW 10,000 as of the date of hospitalization is paid.
From January 13, 2012 to February 4, 2012, the Defendant claimed to provide insurance money under the name of daily hospitalization for the victim on November 20, 2013, after hospitalized the E Council members, claiming for the blick part of the blick part of the blick part of the blick part of the blick part.
However, there was no need for hospitalized treatment because the Defendant did not receive any specific treatment other than medication and physical therapy during the period of hospitalization.
As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,611,455 from the victim on December 9, 2013, and received KRW 1,611,455 from the victim on or around December 9, 2013, and received money from around that time to February 3, 2014 for the purpose of insurance money as stated in the attached crime list, or committed attempted by the victim by refusing payment.
2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was hospitalized for the purpose of treatment, and that the defendant was not hospitalized falsely.
As a result of inquiry into the facts submitted by the Defendant, according to the F Hospital, the Defendant was hospitalized at F Hospital twice (F Hospital No. 6, 10) at the time when the Defendant was hospitalized at F Hospital (F Hospital No. 6, 10) and under the diagnosis of the compromise attachment on Helith, and the fact that the pain continued to have been hospitalized on the part of Helith, and that the Defendant complained of the frith at the time of first hospitalization to E Assembly members (No. 1) at the time of the first hospitalization, the Defendant complained of the frith, the right slot, the right spath, and the left frith at the time of the second hospitalization (No. 5). The Defendant complained of the frith, the left frith, the left frith, and the above two times of hospitalization.