Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:05 on March 8, 2020, the Defendant: (a) avoided disturbance by failing to make a statement related to the facts reported to D, a police officer belonging to the Cdistrict, called “I would go to the police station”; and (b) destroyed the above patrol vehicle in order to cause approximately KRW 683,891 on the back of the driver’s seat of the C Zone E-W-W-W-W-C-W-W-W-W-C-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-C-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-C-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to a written estimate of repair costs for patrols;

1. Relevant Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is to be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, including the circumstances after the crime, etc.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant is recognized to commit a crime, the degree of damage of patrol vehicles is relatively minor, and the circumstances unfavorable to the reimbursement of repair expenses: The defendant has already been punished for the suspension of execution of imprisonment due to the same kind of crime in 2012, and there are records of records of punishment due to obstruction of performance of official duties, assault, etc.