The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant's mistake and reflects the depth of the judgment, that the defendant has yet to be aged 19 years old, that the defendant has no criminal power, that the defendant has been living in a seven-year childcare center due to the parent's divorce, and that the defendant should support the mother who has inconvenience in body and the male and female, and that the victim wants to live in the ship's wife against the defendant by agreement with the victim.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed in the following circumstances: (a) the defendant continuously forced the victim who is merely 16 years of age to engage in sexual traffic; (b) the compensation for the crime is extremely poor due to the use of living expenses, etc. along with his accomplices; (c) the defendant frequently used or threatened the victim refusing sexual traffic; (d) the frequency of compelling sexual traffic; (b) the victim attempted suicide; (c) the crime of this case was committed by the victim; (d) the victim was hospitalized in the mental hospital due to serious mental distress, such as attempted to injure himself due to the depression, etc.; (d) the victim did not recover from substantial damage to the victim; and (e) the defendant was sentenced to two times of a fine due to larceny; and (e) the defendant was subject to a disposition against the crime of this case, such as juvenile protective disposition or suspension of indictment, but did not know about it; and

In addition, considering the defendant's age, criminal records, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, degree of participation, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the minimum punishment of the defendant is three years and six months of imprisonment, the sentence imposed by the court below is unfair.