A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on the grounds of interference with business at the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 30, 2016.

1. The point of interference with business;

A. The Defendant, along with D and E, purchased alcohol at the “G” convenience store located in Suwon-si F, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the date of March 2015, at around 12:00, and requested the victim C, an employee of the above convenience store, to move back to another place because it would interfere with the business of the said convenience store, and upon the request of the victim, “Ie Ie, Ieland, Ienland, Ienland?”

Neina

A. Before he was paid, Doz.

“A police officer who continued to drink alcohol while making a report to the injured person, followed a police officer who was dispatched after having received a report to move to another place by the Defendant D or E, who again entered the convenience store and “I reported to the police”;

Hp. He interfered with the operation of convenience stores of victims by force, in collusion with D and E, by threatening to “d.” at night.

B. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim H in the middle of November 2015, from around 15:00 to around 15:20 of the same day, at the “J beauty room” operated by the victim H in Suwon-si, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s beauty room by force, where the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim was unable to have his hair cut, sound, and the employee of the security company called upon by the victim’s report, who was sent by the victim, was unable to have his hair cut. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s beauty room operation by force.

(c)

The Defendant committed a crime against the Victim K with the victim: (a) on November 2015, 2015, the “M cafeteria” operated by the Victim K in Suwon-si L from around 02:00 to 04:00 of the same day; (b) on the part of the Defendant who was under the influence of alcohol, continued to be a victim who was drinking by ordering the head scambling.