The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and three months, respectively.

(b).

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A (the guilty part of the judgment of the court below) did not have the intent to obtain fraud from Defendant A.

2) The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B (unfair sentencing)’s punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

(c)

1) According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, it is recognized that the Defendants conspired with F, etc. with F, etc. as to the whole crime as stated in the facts charged.

2) The lower court’s sentence against the illegal Defendants is too uneasible.

2. Defendant A asserted that Defendant A had the same purport as the grounds for appeal under this part of this part of the judgment below, and the court below rejected the above assertion and found Defendant A guilty of this part of the facts charged, with the detailed explanation of the aforementioned assertion and its decision under the title “the judgment on the Defendants’ assertion”.

Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below in comparison with the evidence, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and contrary to the judgment below, there is an error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by Defendant A in the judgment below.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, Defendant A’s assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. Judgment on the Prosecutor’s misunderstanding of facts (the part of the judgment of the court below not guilty against the Defendants)

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) No person who violates the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts and Subordinate Statutes shall make an agreement to pay the full amount of contributions or an amount in excess thereof without obtaining authorization, making a registration, etc., as prescribed by other Acts and subordinate statutes, and shall receive similar receipts of contributions.

In collusion with F, the Defendant “H” is a factory producing red powder in collusion with F, etc. on September 2016, and manufactured red powder powder as a raw material for high prices.