Text
1. Defendant, among the parts against the Defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, whose payments exceed the following amounts:
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Codefendant B of the first instance trial, from February 3, 2009 to May 9, 2010, served as the key branch of the company, such as items, book values, Libs, and Blux (hereinafter “instant game item company”) established for the purpose of fostering game character or selling game items, etc., and recruited investors by means of an investment explanation that, with respect to the selling business, the Defendant who is an executive officer or operating employee, and the codefendant C of the first instance trial, together with E, raises game character by using the so-called “the so-called “theorto program” that allows a computer program to proceed with the game, and then, invested KRW 1.1 million per PC to pay dividends of KRW 140,000 per month for 24 months.
B. On March 31, 2010, the Plaintiff invested KRW 36,300,000 in the instant game item company (PC 1 minute) and KRW 36,52 million on April 13, 2010 (PC 32 minute).
C. On April 1, 2010, Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial prepared a “certificate of rent” to the effect that the Plaintiff borrowed the invested principal from the Plaintiff as a means of ensuring the Plaintiff’s investment principal. On April 12, 2010, Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial prepared a “certificate of rent” to the effect that Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial borrowed KRW 36.3 million from the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff with the same room, and the Defendant and Co-Defendant E of the first instance trial signed each of the above certificates of loan to the effect that the Defendant and Co-Defendant E of the first instance trial jointly and severally stand a joint and several surety for the Defendant Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 3 evidence (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is jointly and severally liable with the co-defendant B, C, and E of the first instance trial to pay the above loan debt of KRW 36.3 million to the plaintiff, unless there are special circumstances.
3. The defendant's judgment as to the defendant's defense of repayment is ① Game item of this case to the plaintiff.