The judgment below

All parts of the defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, and I shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months;

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants is too unreasonable.

Defendant

A: Imprisonment of two years, forfeiture of evidence 1 to 58, 202, 595, 684 won

(b) Defendant B: Imprisonment for one year;

(c) Defendant C: 8 months of imprisonment and 8 million won additional collection;

(d) Defendant D: Imprisonment with prison labor for a year, 25 million won additionally collected;

(e) Defendant E: The additional collection of eight months of imprisonment and five million won;

(f) Defendant F: Imprisonment with prison labor for a year, 20 million won additionally collected;

(g) Defendant G: Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, two years of probation, two years of community service order, nine million won and additional collection;

(h) Defendant I: Imprisonment for a year, 27.8 million won additionally collected;

2. Determination

A. The crime of this case except Defendant G, committed the crime of this case on the assertion of unfair sentencing by the remaining Defendants except for Defendant G, is a criminal with great social harm and harm to the public’s spirit of gambling and hindering sound work. The Defendants conspired to commit the crime of this case by opening and operating an illegal gambling site for profit-making purposes, and the crime of this case is not likely to have been committed continuously in light of the size and form of the crime. Defendant A led to the crime of this case, such as continuing to commit the crime by operating the gambling site. Defendant B was involved in the crime of this case, such as managing the members and withdrawing profits by soliciting a total sum of the members with the friendship of Defendant A, and Defendant C was in charge of telephone counseling and withdrawing profits from the members of the gambling site. Defendant D and I provided telephone counseling to the members under the direction of Defendant C, Defendant D and I lent the game of this case to Defendant D, Defendant D and Defendant C, the lessee of the game of this case, and Defendant C, the location of Defendant C’s game management, and Defendant C’s game for 10 years.