logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.13 2014가단5286937
양수금
Text

1. As to KRW 136,979,677 and its KRW 53,610,172 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall be annually from July 28, 2014 to the full payment system.

Reasons

1. A cited part;

A. On May 17, 2007, 15, 15, 207, 207, 36, 940, 235, 163 Samsung Card 10,251, 275, 207, 207, 207, 2585, 256, 36,940, 163, 163, 10,251,235, 135, 785, 1888, 246, 423, 201, 14, 944, 25, 310, 9240, 425, 256, 363, 205, 207, 207, 363, 205, 206, 3636, 205, 206, 375, 286, 2075, 28636, 3636,

(b) Judgment by service based on which recognition is applicable (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The dismissal part of the Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff acquired a general loan loan claim amounting to KRW 34,636,562 from the SBI3 Savings Bank (i.e., KRW 15 million and KRW 19,636,562) other than the above creditor financial institution, but there is no evidence to deem that the Defendant borrowed the above money to the above savings bank. Thus, this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow