logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2013.06.04 2013고단191
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Chuncheon District Court's original state support on June 24, 201, and on March 15, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the same court on March 15, 201, on December 13, 2012.

(See No. 24). The prosecutor’s list was issued respectively.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C observer car.

On March 6, 2013, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of 0.118% of alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license on March 22, 2013, and made the left turn to the left at an irregular speed from the direction of the Director General of the Bohho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to turn to the left.

At the time, the traffic control is not carried out, and at the same time, the victim D(n, 22 years old)'s rocketing car stops. Thus, the driver had a duty of care to safely operate the operation of the operation and operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and the operation of the operation and the operation of the operation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to make a left-hand turn while operating the said vehicle under the circumstances where it is difficult to drive the vehicle normally due to the influence of alcohol as above, and received the left-hand part of the said options car as the front-hand part of the said options car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about one week due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on detection of a motor vehicle driver, a report on whether to drive any danger, and a medical certificate;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Criminal records, their previous dispositions, their previous records, their results, and their summary orders;

arrow