1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Basic facts C (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on November 2013, 2013, and the spouse D, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, the F, G, H, sonO, P, and Q (the grandchildren are the offspring E of the deceased, and they jointly succeed to the deceased’s property.)

The Defendant received each gift from the deceased, from the deceased, 58 m2, 732 m2 before K, 775 m2, and 1514 m2 before N, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of the above lands in the future.

After that, five square meters was divided into the land of 1514 square meters before N, which is divided into five square meters before L.

As of August 8, 2018, the market price of 1,509 square meters prior to N is KRW 193,152,00 for the market price of KRW 130,00 for the market price of KRW 732 square meters prior to L, KRW 54,90,000 for the market price of KRW 732 square meters prior to K, KRW 77,50,000 for the market price of KRW 77,50,00 for the market price of KRW 775 square meters prior to K, and KRW 29,98,00 for the market price of KRW 58,00 for the first forest land (hereinafter referred to as “the market price of each land”), and is specified in the same manner as “the instant N land”.

At the time of death, the deceased owned 89 square meters prior to R, S large 32 square meters, cement block, cement block, and 69.86 square meters for multi-storys.

On August 8, 2018, the market price of the instant R land is KRW 6,319,00, and the market price of the instant S land is KRW 3,20,000, and the market price of the instant one-story housing is KRW 15,229,480.

The Plaintiff filed a claim for the division of inherited property against the deceased’s remaining inheritors as the Seosan Branch of Daejeon Family Court 2017Dhap8, 2017Dhap9 (combined). In the said lawsuit, the conciliation was established to divide each of the real estate listed in the said paragraph into the Plaintiff’s sole ownership.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and 9 through 12, the result of the appraisal commission of appraiser T by this court, the purport of the entire argument, and the plaintiff's assertion of judgment as to the purport of the whole argument, the defendant received from the deceased the gift of the land N, L, K, M, I and the land of the case of the case of the case of this case and infringed the plaintiff's legal reserve of inheritance.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 100,000,000 and damages for delay.

The occurrence of shortage in legal reserve of inheritance.