The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

According to C’s statement in the investigative agency and the court below’s decision, although it is possible to fully recognize the facts charged of this case, the court below found the Defendant not guilty of the remainder of the facts charged of this case which did not believe reliable C’s statement.

Judgment

From 2001, the defendant was introduced through the victim C through his wife and was friendly.

피고인은 피해자에게 피고인을 고위 공무원 출신으로 구권화폐를 처리하기도 하고 국회의원 D의 친척뻘로 경제적인 지식이 많은 행세를 하였다.

The victim C thought the defendant as a force personnel and delivered the expense for the defendant in the vicinity of the victim.

피고인은 2004. 11. 26.경 전화로 피해자에게 ‘불상(佛像)이 있는데, 이 불상을 어디에 맡겨도 10억 원은 받을 수 있다. 1,000만 원을 융통해 주면 3일 안에 배를 갚겠다’고 거짓말하여 이에 속은 피해자로 하여금 같은 날 지인 E을 통해 피해자의 처 F의 농협 계좌로 1,000만 원을 차용하게 하고, 2004. 12. 2. 피고인의 계좌, 피고인이 지정한 G의 계좌로 각각 500만 원을 송금받았다.

However, there was no fact in fact, and there was no security value, and the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay the amount of KRW 20 million, which is the total amount within three days.

On January 22, 2005, the Defendant marks Kuwait’s currency to the President of H in the Republic of Korea prior to E, but the currency remains, and thus, the currency remains. The expenses to be handled by the Defendant is required. It is false to the effect that the Defendant shall be repaid twice to 30,000,000 won to the Defendant’s wife’s account via E, with the money borrowed by the Defendant as security prior to the face of 20,000 won. The money borrowed by the Defendant as security prior to the face of 20,000 won, and that it shall be repaid twice to 3,00,000 won by the victim’s wife’s account via E.