The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On July 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 05:20 on July 2, 2012, at the home of the victim D (the age of 36) who the Defendant works for Bodol-gun Cudio 306, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as knee, knee, knee, knee, face of the victim’s bridge one time, knee, knee, and knee, knee, knee, knee, kne, kne, and kne, thereby causing the victim to undergo a two-time medical treatment.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the police officers and legal statements of the victim D and the written diagnosis of injury, etc. are located.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is insufficient to recognize that the victim’s statement is difficult to believe as it is and the remainder of evidence alone is the victim’s injury, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition with the decision of not guilty under the latter part of Article 325 of the

① On July 7, 2012, the victim stated that the Defendant was able to buck down the buckbucks, bucking against her head, and was sucking off by sucking the bucks.

② On July 21, 2012, the victim stated on July 21, 2012 that her husband had talked about the rate of mixing of milk with the police, and that her husband had talked about drinking drugs, and that she had taken the left bucks in front of the sudden and rear bucks.

③ 그 후 이 법원에 이르러 공소사실 기재와 같이 무릎으로 피해자의 다리를 찼다고 하였다가 나중에는 무릎인지 발뒤꿈치인지는 정확히 기억이 나지 않지만 다리를 차인 것은 확실하다고 진술하여, 피고인이 피해자에게 폭행을 가한 순서 뺨이 먼저인지...