1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 64,308,137 as well as 5% per annum from January 7, 2014 to February 14, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person running the industrial accident compensation insurance business pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), and the Defendant A is the driver of the car carriage vehicle C (hereinafter “HA”), and the Defendant B is the owner of the vehicle under the register of automobile.

B. At around 04:50 on November 11, 2012, Nonparty D (hereinafter “victim”), a taxi engineer, operated two-lanes in the direction of literacy apartment in front of the Seocheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-do, where a sea-going vehicle, which was operated in the direction of the Jincheon-gu, in front of the Jincheon-gu, Yancheon-do, was faced with the center line at the location of the accident, resulting in an accident of a collision between the front part of the damaged vehicle and the front part of the damaged vehicle and without providing relief to the victims and passengers who were seriously injured (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. Due to the instant accident, the victim suffered injuries, such as damage to the light water (centered emulsion), dives of multiples, wharfs, both sides of a wharfs, damage to the right shoulder, damage to the right shouldering opening, right shouldering, right-side erode, and electric power rope infection.

By April 7, 2011, the Plaintiff paid 65,817,924 won in total, including 22,737,980 won in medical care benefits, 13,457,120 won in temporary disability benefits, and disability benefits 29,62,824 in accordance with the Industrial Accident Compensation Act.

[Reasons for Recognition] The judgment by public notice against Defendant A (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act), each entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including additional numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings against Defendant B

2. Liability for damages and occurrence of the right of indemnity;

A. According to the above facts, the accident of this case is neglected despite the fact that Defendant A, the driver of a sea-going vehicle, has a duty of care to observe road-related laws and regulations and vehicle lanes.