Text
1. B, which is a joint management of the debtor B, the debtor B, who is the defendant B, whose exchange has been changed in this court.
Reasons
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and it is not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion as evidence to be additionally submitted by this court. Except for the entries of Gap evidence Nos. 16 through 35 (including the number of each issue) and the result of this court's response to the order to submit financial transaction information to G Co., Ltd. of this court, it is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it
2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was written after the dismissal, is all referred to as “B”.
The grounds of the first instance judgment are as follows.
1. Basic facts D2) as follows. 2) The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the crime that B had forged and exercised a construction contract agreement under the above B B(3). B was acquitted on February 20, 2018 (2017dan2169). On June 28, 2018, the Busan District Court rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor’s appeal at the Busan District Court (2018No8888) and around that time, the said judgment became final and conclusive.
【The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance include the following:
E. B’s commencement of rehabilitation procedures and Plaintiff’s report on the Plaintiff’s claim 1) on November 9, 2018 during the instant lawsuit, the decision to commence rehabilitation procedures for B was made on November 9, 2018 with Busan District Court 2018dan1023, and B and J were appointed as joint managers of the debtor B. 2) The joint managers of B were required to report rehabilitation claims from December 1, 2018 to December 14, 2018. However, even if the period for reporting the claims is over, the creditors reported within the period for reporting are able to report their claims until the 2 and 3-time meeting of interested persons, but the reported creditors are able to first write down the deadline within the reporting period as far as possible.
3. On December 28, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a subsequent report on the claim sought by the instant lawsuit as a rehabilitation claim.