logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.05.18 2018고정271
유사수신행위의규제에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall receive contributions from an unspecified person under an agreement to make payment of the total amount of contributions or an amount in excess thereof in the future without obtaining authorization or permission, making registration, making a report, etc.

Nevertheless, in operating the “D” office in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the role of providing investment explanation and consultation, and the Defendant conspired with each other to attract investors and provide investment explanation, and the Defendant and B do not obtain authorization, permission, registration, or report under the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and from July 2016 to the following investors, including E, from the above D office, “D is a foreign investment company, and Malaysia is making an investment in the F development project for making theme park, etc. to the Malaysia F.

At present, when paying the investment money, the profits from the investment in the F Development Project will be refunded as dividends every two weeks or month.

In explaining “The amount equivalent to the principal within six months” shall be paid and the dividends shall be paid until the total amount paid by the investor reaches four times the principal amount.

“Along on August 12, 2016, the Plaintiff received KRW 37,125,00 from E, around October 23, 2016, KRW 3,000,00 from G, and KRW 4,00,000 around November 20, 2016, KRW 1,00,000,000 from H around October 29, 2016, and KRW 5,695,943, and KRW 106,63,000 around 2016, around 2016, around 2016, around 2016, around 306, around 2016, around 2016, KRW 2,87,50,00 from J, around October 31, 2016, KRW 105,01, and KRW 16,507, around 201, and around 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Investigation report (this case’s M currency for investors);

1. Each police statement on E, K, G, I, and L;

1. Written Statement;

1. Details of remittance of investment funds;

1. The Stockholm content, G, I.

arrow