logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.03.28 2017고정423
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 26, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would make a request for the installation of the Internet and television goods provided by LG No. 127 505, 127, 505, Gunsan-si, in the manner that he would make monthly payment to the employees in charge of the name in charge by putting on the phone at the Internet entrance attraction store of 'D' operated by the victim C at a place where the location is unknown.

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay monthly agreed usage fees even if he was installed by the victim of the Internet and TV goods, and the victim was able to receive cash that was provided by the victim as the personal goods and consumed them as the cost of living.

The Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and was set up in a set of the Internet and TV goods provided by LG on March 8, 2016 under the terms of three-year arrangement, and was transferred cash KRW 390,000 to the Defendant’s Nonghyup Bank account from the victim on March 11, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given money from the victim by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit transactions;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant, without certain occupation, seems to have caused the instant crime due to the lack of living expenses.

The fact that the defendant has repaid the amount of damage to the victim, his mistake is divided and reflected, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

In these circumstances, the defendant's age, relationship with the victim, means and results of the crime, and various circumstances revealed in the arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the sentence as ordered.

arrow