1. The Defendant: KRW 1,00,000 for Plaintiff A, and KRW 500,000 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 100,000 for each of them.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) E is a F Vehicle around 07:35 June 3, 2010 (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

) A driving the Plaintiff, while proceeding at the entrance intersection in Chuncheon-si, Dong-si, Dong-si, the central line was obstructed by negligence, and the Plaintiff’s G vehicle driven at the right-hand side of marina course was received from the Plaintiff’s G vehicle, and suffered injury, such as the extension of the original flab and the structural frame, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

3) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A. [The grounds for recognition: The fact that there is no dispute, each entry or video of Plaintiff A’s evidence (including a branch number if there is a branch number) and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments.

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. The defendant asserts that since the plaintiff A was aware of the defendant's vehicle from the point of 100 meters prior to the crossing to the intersection, the defendant's vehicle was obligated to drive the vehicle at the left or right-hand turn to the left, and not to conflict with his own vehicle, the accident of this case occurred by entering the intersection without stopping the temporary stop line at the intersection, and therefore, the plaintiff A was negligent.

Plaintiff

A has no evidence to recognize that the instant accident occurred after entering the intersection beyond the temporary suspension line.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant’s vehicle entered the right-hand or right-hand edge in the intersection where the left-hand or right-hand turn is possible, and that the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was not at the right-hand edge, crosses the safety zone and crosses the center line of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was not at the right-hand edge, was shocked. Thus, the Defendant’s vehicle is the Plaintiff