logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.12.15 2017고단2108
국가기술자격법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In August 2006, the Defendant received a proposal from B to the office operated by B, a lending broker of national technical qualification certificate in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, which was located in Dongdaemun-gu, for the purpose of “to lease a national technical qualification certificate to a construction business entity with four insurances and to pay 2,500,000 won per year.” The Defendant issued a national technical qualification witness engineer qualification certificate owned by the Defendant to B and lent it.

The Defendant, after being contacted with B on a one-year basis each year thereafter, renewed and lent a license of an industrial engineer in construction owned by the Defendant. On August 2012, the Defendant received the aforementioned proposal from B by telephone at a place where the location cannot be known, and lent a license of an industrial engineer in construction owned by the Defendant. The Defendant, who was a construction business entity, had IM used the said license from that time until November 30, 2015.

In addition, on August 30, 2016, the Defendant received the aforementioned proposal from B by telephone at a place where it is difficult to identify the place of light, and lent the qualification certificate of the construction industrial engineer owned by the Defendant, and had Tats General Construction Co., Ltd., a constructor use the above qualification certificate from that time until February 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant lent national technical qualification certificate to others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of each police in relation to C or D;

1. Each judgment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 26 (3) 1 and Article 15 (2) of the Act on the Selection of National Technical Qualification for Crimes and Articles 26 (3) 2 and 15 (2) of the Act on the Selection of Fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow