logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.01.12 2017고단1902
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court, and on June 8, 2015, the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Busan Detention House.

1. "2017 Highest 1902";

A. On September 5, 2017, at around 20:00, the Defendant was provided two sicks and one week from the injured party by deceiving the victim as if he did not have any money under water and would have paid the drinking value although he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value.

As above, the defendant deceiving the victim and received 400,000 won of the market price from the injured party, and escaped without paying the drinking value.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On September 6, 2017, the Defendant, at around 02:20 on September 6, 2017, at “H, operated by the Victim G in F at F at the time of leisure, was provided two C and C by deceiving the victim as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value because of the lack of money in water and would have paid the drinking value, thereby inducing the victim to pay the drinking value.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, provided the victim with the two weeks equivalent to the market value of KRW 400,00,000, and the services equivalent to KRW 60,000, and escaped without paying the drinking value.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property equivalent to KRW 400,000, and acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 60,000.

2. On September 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on September 23, 2017, the Defendant: (b) at the K Entertainment entertainment shop operated by the Victim J in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu; and (c) despite the absence of intent or ability to pay the price even if the Defendant orders food because there was no money in water and no particular import; (b) ordered the Defendant to pay the price for food to the victim as if he would normally pay the price for food; and (c) then, the Defendant received the price for food and drink from the damaged person at KRW 75,00,00,000 from the damaged person at KRW 75,00,00; and (d) obtained the price for food and drink.

3.

arrow