A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:40 on November 13, 2014, the Defendant was running a DSS5 car in front of the station of “C” in the Gu-si, Si-si, Si-si, and was driving into the front line from the distance from the center of the central market to the front line. On the ground that Francing bus vehicles operated by E are blocking their course, the Defendant was damaged to the front line of the damaged vehicle, which is an object dangerous to the front line of the damaged vehicle due to rapid stop and stop at approximately 12 meters in the direction of the running of the damaged vehicle, and the Defendant was damaged to the lower part of the damaged vehicle, which is an object dangerous to the front one of the damaged vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report and photographs;

1. Borrowing;

1. Application of written estimate (F)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da15488, Apr. 1, 2007) (see, 2009Da11338, Jan. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da11334, Jan.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);