1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for “an additional or modified portion” under Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance regarding the addition and amendment

After the “Conclusion of the Agreement,” the Plaintiff and Defendant C may be viewed as the contracting party according to the instant service agreement, but the Plaintiff and the Defendants appear to have not contested the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant Foundation are the Plaintiff and the Defendant Foundation. As such, the aforementioned arrangement is made).

The judgment of the court of first instance is 3-C and D.

The following shall be deleted and added:

C. In addition, comprehensively taking account of the evidence No. 4, evidence No. 5-1 to No. 4, evidence No. 5-2, evidence No. 1 to No. 2, and the fact-finding results and the purport of the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s consultation report on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, “the increase in the admission fees following the adjustment of grade No. 1” among the consulting report provided by the Plaintiff to the Defendant Foundation is about 16, and about 7, a nurse working in the instant convalescent hospital as of July 11, 2014, and about 6,180,936 won as personnel expenses, where the Defendant Foundation additionally employs two nurses and one assistant nurse, the amount of admission fees paid by the Health Insurance Service is about 100 patients per month, and thus, the annual revenue of the instant convalescent hospital is about 93,228,768 won, and the amount of the consultation fees paid by the Plaintiff cannot be paid from the Plaintiff 14.

(b) the purpose of this section.