logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.09.16 2020고단1068
재물손괴
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the defendant was the victim B(n, 57 years of age) and the legal couple, he continued to reside in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D on February 5, 2020 while he was living in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D, he was forced to go out of the above apartment on February 5, 2020 by the enforcement officer of the Seoul Northern District Court.

On February 5, 2020, the Defendant, at around 15:57 on February 15, 2020, destroyed the 300,000 won of the market price owned by the victim on the ground that the Defendant was subject to compulsory execution in front of the above D on the ground that he was making a fire.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness B, the photograph of the damaged article, and the receipt of damage;

1. Application of CCTV CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 36 of the relevant criminal facts, Article 366 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the history of punishment for the punishment of imprisonment with labor is several times, crime of assault against the victim at the time of maintaining a matrimonial relationship with the victim, etc. It appears that the victim has been continuously using violence against the victim. The defendant continued to reside in the apartment of this case even after divorce with the victim. Despite the completion of delivery in accordance with the court's compulsory execution procedure, it is not good that the defendant committed the crime, such as returning the apartment of this case to the apartment of this case and destroying the entrance door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, etc. The above act goes beyond mere damage to property, thereby threatening the victim's peace and peace. The victim and his child appears to have suffered considerable help and mental distress. The defendant is urgently needed to deny the crime, and the defendant does not seem to have any contrary attitude at all, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive of the crime before and after the crime.

arrow