logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.08.23 2013고단571
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of 4 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the inn branch of Suwon District Court on May 23, 2012, and on April 7, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of 5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence) at the inn branch of Suwon District Court on April 7, 2008. On March 7, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of 1 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the inn branch of Suwon District Court on March 7, 2008. On November 27, 2007, in addition to the issuance of a summary order of a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refluence) at the Sungnam branch of Suwon District Court on November 27, 2007

1. At around 23:30 on May 27, 2013, the Defendant driven a B car owned by the Defendant under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.148% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 8km, from the Do in front of the two-dimensional market in the Yangyang-si Yang-si, Gyeonggi-do, to the front day of the new luminous Do-gun, the two-dimensional Do, the two-dimensional Do, a two-dimensional Do, a two-dimensional Do, a two-dimensional Do, a two-dimensional Do, a two-dimensional Do.

2. No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the car with the upper car owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front of the front of the new car lending system at the above time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Previouss before ruling: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Act on Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow