logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.24 2018누62708
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as citing the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as indicated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification as follows 2. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as it is. 2. The following is added to the part 3rd below. 2. The legal principles pertaining to private school teachers are appointed and dismissed by school juristic persons or private school managers, and their appointment and dismissal are based on private employment contracts, and private school teachers receive wages from school juristic persons, etc. in return for educating students. Thus, in principle, the appointment and dismissal of private school teachers constitutes private school teachers and private school teachers, and the competent authorities report to the competent authorities on the appointment and dismissal of private school teachers, and the competent authorities, in certain cases, provide guidance, support and regulation to school juristic persons such as the State, etc., and give rise to the exercise of their qualifications and nature as public educational officials.

arrow