The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 19, 2016, the summary of the facts charged in this case, around 10:50, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim B by openly pointing out facts, such as sending a document stating the contents of disciplinary action to the Financial Supervisory Service and sending it to the Financial Supervisory Service, under the title, “B, despite his legal spouse’s work in the Financial Supervisory Service, has served as the same spouse in the Financial Supervisory Service.”

2. The instant crime is an offense falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the complainant B did not want to punish the defendant on February 2, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case, and submitted a statement of agreement and withdrawal of complaint to the court on February 5, 2018, and submitted the statement of agreement and withdrawal of complaint to the court on February 5, 2018.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.