logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.31 2016고단398
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty to drive a Grand Co., Ltd. in Ireland.

On January 26, 2016, the Defendant driven the above 05:30 on the 26th 05:30, while proceeding the intersection in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City toward the direction of the Adodi exhibition center in the direction of this village.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed, to take the front door and left door well, and to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system, thereby safely proceeding in accordance with traffic signals, and to prevent accidents from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got off the center line and entered the intersection in contravention of the signal, and was negligent by the Defendant’s failure to go through the intersection to the right side from the left side of the parallel driving direction of the Defendant, and received the part of the fenced part of the victim C driver’s D driver’s Kata-si, who passed the intersection to the right side in accordance with the progress signals.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim C, such as cryp and cryp salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim E, who was on board the back seat of the damaged taxi, suffered from the victim F, a passenger on board the back seat, such as cryp cryp including two cryp cryp for about four weeks of treatment, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the damaged taxi to cover KRW 10,283,96 of repair cost, such as the exchange of dyp cryp crypers, and providing relief to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on internal investigation (specific person under suspicion);

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Article 5-3 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes as to the crime under the pertinent provision of the Act.

arrow