logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.14 2017고단1402
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around December 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 01:36, at the world beer selling point of the trade name of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1 Ground D'D' on December 4, 2016, within the amount equivalent to KRW 5.80,00 in cash from the walling where the victim E was off from his/her front part.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Notification of the results of video appraisal;

1. The Defendant asserts that CCTV images [the Defendant’s assertion against the Defendant] did not steals cash located on a wall, although it was written by the victim’s fastening.

However, according to the evidence duly examined and adopted by this Court as to whether cash was given to the victim's wall, first of all, the victim's 112 report on the day of the instant case, and then the victim was stolen at the level of KRW 600,000 in cash during this process.

2) 50,000 won in cash as part of 110,000 won and 580,000 won in case of the police investigation

(3) In this court, the amount of cash and its types are relatively specific in terms of the amount of cash and its types when preparing a written statement, which was stolen.

(4) In addition, the calculation of the drinking value before reaching the location of the instant accident and the confirmation of the branch line are relatively detailed and consistent. (5) It is recognized that the distance from which the victimized person moves to the location of the instant accident does not exceed 200 meters, and the time of movement is shorter, and that the victim was holding the said money in the face line, and that the said branch line was put in the seat line.

Next, according to the evidence duly examined and adopted by this court as to whether the defendant stolens cash, the victim's 01:05 wallets.

arrow