logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.10.25 2017고단2494
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Defendant A(Defendant A) is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle which is C, and B is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of D rocketing.

Defendant

A, around 02:00 on September 17, 2017, by driving the said car, the two-lanes of national highways near Pyeongtaek-si 1 were driven at a speed of about 111 km per hour in excess of 31 km per hour, the speed of 80 km per hour, which is the Do in accordance with the two-lanes, from the underground side of the non-exclusive vehicular road at the time of Yanan-si, J, and B, driving the said car at a speed of about 111 km per hour while driving the said car at a speed that is difficult to know about the same Myeon depending on the one-lane of the said road.

At the time, the road was located at night and was located in the underground vehicular road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle who is well aware of the right and the right and the right and the right, and a proper operation of steering devices and brakes.

Nevertheless, Defendant A received the front part of the victim F(73 ) driver's bicycle in front of the running direction by negligence proceeding more than 31 km of the regulatory speed from the victim F(73 ) in front of the driving direction, and the victim got above the front part of the said passenger vehicle and let the victim go beyond the first lane along with the bicycle, and the victim followed the last one lane.

B, due to the foregoing preceding accidents, the victim, who stopped on the side and gets off non-products from the road due to the foregoing preceding accidents, was placed in the said car using the said car without stopping and driving over one lane due to negligence.

After all, the defendant A caused the victim to die in his job due to the diversified long-term damage due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the defendant A or B;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, I, and J;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, and reports on the investigation of each traffic accident;

arrow