1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed Party C jointly and severally, KRW 130,000,000, and the said amount.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) entered into an agreement with the following terms (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with respect to the 5,157 square meters of E forest land, 2,380 square meters of F forest land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant site”) around December 21, 201, G large scale 5,330 square meters and H large scale 2,359 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”).

1. The plaintiff shall, after completing the building constructed in the name of the plaintiff, have the defendant use the expense for five years on the site of this case, and the defendant shall bear the amount of the property tax imposed on the above site and the completed building as the rent for five years.

2. The defendant used the building for the above five years and, unless there is a separate agreement with the plaintiff as to the use of the building, ordered the original height of the building immediately and removed from the building.

3. After the completion of a building, when a person who is not the defendant registers as a business for the use of the building, the user of the building shall enter into an agreement with the plaintiff and the plaintiff shall cooperate in the business registration.

4. If the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not have any separate agreement as to the use of the building, and did not order the building, the Defendant and the building users shall jointly and severally pay a penalty of KRW 1 million per day to the Plaintiff.

B. On October 9, 2012, the Plaintiff leased the Defendant with construction costs, etc., KRW 130 million,00,000,000 to the Defendant on a preferential basis after opening a restaurant. The Selection C also signed the loan certificate for KRW 130,00,000 (hereinafter “the loan certificate in this case”).

C. In accordance with the instant agreement, around December 2012, the Defendant: (a) around the second class neighborhood living facilities (general restaurants) in the second class neighborhood living facilities (general restaurants); and (b) 320.5 square meters in the second class neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter collectively collectively referred to as “each of the instant buildings”) of the Pipe structure, sand site location panel, and the 2nd class neighborhood living facilities in the light metal structure, the sand site location plate, and the 320.5 square meters in each of the instant buildings.