logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.12 2017고단4980
사기
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around July 15, 2015, at the office operated by the Defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul) around July 15, 2015, can secure objects (right to move into a commercial building) that can receive a site for livelihood countermeasures (right to move into a commercial building) while proceeding work in the present price F.

In the event that a vinyl house located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government or H is deemed a farmer of a vinyl house, he/she may receive compensation as above, and the said E and the said E concluded a contract to move into a shopping mall by stating that the said 100 million won will be sought, and on August 10, 2015, five of the items (right to move into a shopping mall) promised to “the victim at the above C office” (right to move into a shopping mall) with the consent of land owner I, and the remaining five of the items were still in the work.

However, at the time, the above Seoul Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G and H designated the housing site development project as a public housing zone in both sides of the national land at the time, but in order to receive compensation, the consent from the land owner for the use of the land was obtained, and the compensation was finalized through the J’s due diligence. At the time, the defendant was unaware of who is the owner of the land in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the H and the lessee who was a plastic house in the place, and the tenant who was in the plastic house at the time, was not able to obtain the land for livelihood measures (right to occupy the commercial building), and there was no intention or ability to provide the right properly even if he received money from the damaged person as the price for the sale of the right.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 185 million from the victim, as the purchase price, around August 10, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statements of witnesses D, E, K, and L;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement of the suspect interrogation of the defendant (2 times, E part of the statement).

arrow