The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant, while suffering from the mincing mincing mincing (hereinafter “the instant mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing (hereinafter “the instant mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing mincing min

B. The lower court’s sentence (one million won in penalty) against an unfair defendant in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the CCTV images at the scene of the crime, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record of this case’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts are acknowledged as follows: (i) according to the CCTV images at the scene of the crime, the Defendant was off the door of this case before entering the door of this case; (ii) was out of and out of other external operations displayed within the store; and (iii) was out of such external operations; and (iv) was out of the original space by suffering the door of this case from the door of this case; and (v) was out of other clothes; and (v) was out of the natural string, and was out of the door of this case; and as alleged by the Defendant, it was sufficiently recognized that the Defendant was out of the door of this case’s own money or the surrounding areas of his own money or the store; and (v) was returned to the victim after six days from the point of this case’s entry into the door of this case.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. The following are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant returned the instant expansion to the victim; (b) only one fine was imposed; (c) there was no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and (d) the amount of damage to the larceny is a relatively small amount of KRW 1.50,000.

However, the defendant is the defendant.