logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.07.19 2018나202539
부당이득금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is that “An appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2017Do21598) is not yet finalized by the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2017Do21598)” in Part 3, Part 12 and Part 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the foregoing judgment has become final and conclusive upon the dismissal of the final appeal on February 2, 2018, following the dismissal of the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2017Do21598).” In addition, “No. 28 evidence” was added to the grounds for the recognition of basic facts, and “the payment period” in the Part 5, Part 4 and 5 is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for those cases where “the payment period is to be made” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow