1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2007, the defendant received a summary order of 1,500,000 won of a fine for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Busan District Court on November 14, 2007, and a summary order of 1 million won of a fine for the same crime from the Busan District Court's Dong Branch of the Busan District Court on November 10, 208.

Criminal facts

1. Around 20:10 on March 15, 2016, the Defendant driven a C-do motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling of about 0.080% from a 500-meter section to a road front of “the frequency sled down, so sled,” which is located in the 2-dong Busan Shipping Daegu-gu, Busan, to the “ Home P-dop” road located in the same Dong.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, and drives a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license in a drunken state in violation of the above provision.

2. Around 20:20 on March 15, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) led the Defendant to change the course from the three-lanes, the direction of the proceeding, to the two-lanes, immediately after the Defendant driving the relevant franchise car as indicated in paragraph (1) on March 15, 2016, and turning the Olympic intersection in Busan High Do, Daegu Do, Busan,

In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident by safely driving the vehicle, such as using the direction for the change of the vehicle line, and accurately manipulating the steering direction and operating system of the vehicle in the front and rear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in changing the course of the Defendant’s two-lanes following the Defendant’s vehicle to the left-hand part of the victim D(W, 58 years old), which was driven by the Defendant’s two-lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s perception that the above occupational negligence requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.