Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:30 on May 18, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the taxi of the victim for about 20 minutes by getting the victim from the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff’s C taxi in the vicinity of the Mapo-gu Seoul Hong University, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and getting on the first front of the Landong-ro 1257-ro petition rack loan, which is located on the top of the taxi, spiting the taxi, spiting the taxi on the top of the taxi, and requesting the victim to pay the taxi fee and getting off the taxi. The Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the taxi.

2. On May 18, 2015, on the road above 01:55, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was urged by the police officer E of the Hansan Police Station D District District Police Station, the Defendant, who received a report of his disturbance without paying the taxi fare, to pay the taxi fare and to return home; (b) without complying with it; and (c) stated that the police officer “I must do so. I will do so” without complying with it; (d) the Defendant carried the flick of the police officer, carried the flick of the police officer; (e) carried the flick of the police officer; and (e) interfered with the police officer’s performance of official duties in relation to the police officer’s reporting duties by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning E and B;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (it does not seem that the amount of fine specified in the summary order is excessive in light of the course and degree of each of the crimes in this case, degree of recovery from damage, etc. even