logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.30 2015나68682
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court has stated this part of the basic facts shall be stated by the first instance court.

2.(b)

(2) In addition to the completion of the statute of limitations as follows, it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Supreme Court Decisions 93Da3622 delivered on April 13, 1993; 92Da3982 delivered on July 13, 1993, regarding the nature of the right to claim directly against the insurer by the victim (A) whether the extinctive prescription expires, and some Supreme Court Decisions 93Da362 delivered on April 13, 1993, and 92Da3982 delivered on July 13, 1993, are deemed to have taken the position of the theory of the right to claim insurance (in this case, the extinctive prescription begins from the time when the insurance accident occurred, and the same applies to the time when the extinctive prescription expires). However, the

(B) In liability insurance, Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act provides that a third party, the injured party, may directly claim for compensation from an insurer within the limit of the insured amount, for any damage caused by an accident attributable to the insured in liability insurance. Under Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act, a direct claim against an insurer under Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act is an insurer who concurrently takes over the insured’s liability for compensation against the insured and the injured party has the right to claim compensation against the insurer. Thus, if the injured party or his/her legal representative fails to exercise it for three years from

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 92Da2530, May 11, 1993; 2003Da67774, Oct. 7, 2005). Furthermore, the nature of the right of direct claim and the extinctive prescription that the victim has against the insurer according to the terms and conditions established in accordance with the provisions of the Commercial Act should also be deemed as well.

As seen earlier, it is difficult to view.

arrow