1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiffs A, B, C, and D with each of the money indicated in the separate sheet recognition column and each of the said money.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant Hae Construction Co., Ltd., a constructor under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) awarded a contract for 1 section B of the construction of the Haeong Construction Co., Ltd. for the construction of the Haepo Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri Tri H from Seopo, and performed the construction from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2017, I awarded a lump sum subcontract to I, and I given a sub-subcontract to Defendant F during the said construction.

B. I or Defendant F is not a constructor under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, and the Plaintiffs were employed by Defendant F as a molder and retired from work at the same construction site during each period indicated in the separate sheet service period column for the attached list.

【Defendant F based on Recognition: The defendant company without dispute: The non-contentious facts; the entry of Gap evidence 1 through 3; the fact inquiry results with respect to the Administrator of Gwangju Regional Employment and Labor Office of this court; the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. Since there is no dispute between the parties that Defendant F did not pay each of the plaintiffs' wages, such as the claim amount column in the separate sheet, as to the claim against Defendant F, Defendant F is obligated to pay each of the above wages and the corresponding damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from the initial date of calculation to the date of full payment from the initial date of calculation in the same list with the same 14th day after the final working date to the date of full payment.

B. According to each of the above evidence, Defendant F did not pay each of the Plaintiffs’ wages on May 1, 2017 through July 7, 2017, as stated in the separate list column. (2) Plaintiff E argues that the above recognition was not paid 2,530,000 won as wages during the period of service from April 10, 2017 to May 23, 2017, as well as 2,530,000 won as wages during the period of service, and that the above 2,530,000 won should be paid further.

According to the records of Gap evidence No. 1.