1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows 2. A. The reasons why this case is stated are "Evidence" in the 7th page 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In addition to paragraph (1) and (2) of Section 8 of Section 4 of Section 8, the following "Evidences (Evidence 3, 6)" shall be added, and the "No. 5 through 8 of Section 8 shall be deemed to occur."

“Along up to the place,” and “Along to the place,” the Defendant’s selection of scars construction, south-dos construction, etc. as a contractor on the sole basis that until March 31, 2006, the condition of the 30th order of contract priority recommendation cannot be deemed as a condition that the fulfillment was not possible at the time of preparation of the implementation agreement in this case, and that the said condition was not “the second sentence.”

“The following 2.B.

In addition to adding a claim, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The addition;

A. [The Plaintiff’s representative director, director, and auditor of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant’s partnership head, vice partnership head, auditor, and director, etc. are not limited to the time limit for recommendation for the project execution of the instant joint execution agreement. The Plaintiff’s representative director, E, and the Defendant’s partnership head by participating in the Plaintiff’s partnership head, and the Plaintiff’s officers came to know of the fact that E, while selling the Plaintiff’s outstanding stocks owned by him/her, he/she solely prepared the instant execution agreement (written agreement) by selling the Plaintiff’s outstanding stocks owned by him/her [the Plaintiff asserted that F, by deceiving and pressure, made the instant execution agreement (written agreement) by E/F, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

【】

B. [On the other hand, the following circumstances revealed by the entire purport of entry in the evidence No. 3 and the pleading No. 3, i.e., the Defendant’s net loss at the time of December 31, 201 to KRW 8,385,804,206 (see evidence No. 17 of this case) (2) as of the date of closing the argument of this case, the Plaintiff has against the Defendant by the final judgment No. 2012 or 28310 of Seoul High Court as of the date of closing the argument of this case.