logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.08 2014고정928
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On December 15, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 00:04, and driven the road in front of the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Agricultural and Fishery Product Market 533-1, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, at a speed of about 70 kilometers in speed from the side of the World Cup stadium to the networkwon-dong, according to three lanes in speed.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well with the signal, etc. and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with its signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the DNA taxi driving by the victim C(58 years of age) who was left to the right from the opposite direction of the sexual scam in accordance with the new subparagraph from a scam by negligence in contravention of the signal.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim C by negligence in the course of performing the above duties the injury to the victim E (years 24) and the victim E (years 24) on board the damaged vehicle, each of whom requires a two-day medical treatment, such as light dysium, etc., and the victim G (years 49) on board the Defendant’s vehicle in need of a two-day medical treatment; and the victim H (years 44) on the part of the victim G (years 49) who did not keep the right right for a three-month medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement A and C;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents, and vehicle photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, the proviso of Article 268 of

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow