logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.09.18 2015고정962
업무상과실장물취득
Text

Defendant

The sentence for A and B shall be suspended.

Defendant

C. The summary of the judgment on Defendant C is not guilty.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A is a person engaged in sales of precious metals with the trade name “H” in the Hanam-si of Gyeonggi-do.

On October 20, 2014, the Defendant purchased 14k gold bars, which were owned by the victim’s name and incompetence, from the victim’s name and incompetence, from the above H.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in sales of precious metals, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining his/her personal information, contact information, etc., and the details of the acquisition of the gold and half of the gold and the motive for sales and the price of the gold and the price suitable for transaction prices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting such care, purchased three gold bars in KRW 410,000 and acquired stolen goods by negligence, even though he neglected to make a judgment on stolen goods.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in sales of precious metals with the trade name “K” in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan CityJ.

On January 13, 2015, the Defendant purchased 14 k gold gmp, the victim’s name and influence, which he stolen from the said K, from I.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in sales of precious metals, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining his/her personal information, contact information, etc., and the details of his/her acquisition, the motive of the sale, and the price suitable for the transaction prices.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected such care and acquired the stolen in 190,000 won after purchasing one gold ging, which was negligent in neglecting the judgment on the stolen property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each part of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants (including each attached book and photograph);

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning I;

1. The police seizure protocol and the list of seizures are the Defendants.

arrow