1. The Defendant’s KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff, as well as 6% per annum from December 30, 2014 to July 28, 2015.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is liable to provide the Defendant with freezing and freezing parts and equipment from December 1, 2013 to December 29, 2014, and to provide some of them, but it is recognized that the remainder of five million won has not been paid: entry in the evidence No. 1 to 4 and the purport of the entire pleadings. Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay to the Plaintiff 6% per annum from December 30, 2014 to July 28, 2015, the delivery date of payment order, 20% per annum from the next day to September 30, 2015, and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

(2) On February, 200, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant’s claim against the Defendant was based on the amendment of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and that the parts supplied by the Plaintiff were supplied to “B” located in Busan, and that the parts were supplied to “C,” but the supply was made to “C,” but the final consumer corporation was not a normal trial operation due to lack of meeting the conditions of trial operation.

The evidence submitted by the defendant (each of the evidence Nos. 1 through 6) alone is difficult to find that the defect occurred due to the product supplied by the plaintiff, and further, it is not a ground to oppose the plaintiff that the defendant failed to receive the construction cost from the supplied company.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition.