1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 6.

The Plaintiff is a school safety mutual aid association established by the superintendent of education of Ulsan Metropolitan City pursuant to Article 15 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for Accidents in School, and is a corporation engaged in affairs related to the payment of medical expenses, etc. for victim students in school violence and the exercise of the right to indemnity pursuant to Article 18 (1) 2-2 of the Act and Article 16 (6) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”). Defendant A is the guardian of Cmiddle School student in Ulsan Metropolitan City, and Defendant B is the guardian of E who is the same school student.

B. D. On June 2013, Ha, F left the snife of F, a female student of the same school, with the snife of F, “Crife, dead, Grife,” etc. left the snife.

(c) thereafter, this year is applicable to the F.

7. 4. In consultation with a teacher in charge, the teacher suffered mental harm caused by the abortion, and the same year;

7. 23. Along with the meeting of the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence, F shall undergo psychological counseling and advice in accordance with Article 16(1)1 of the School Violence Prevention Act, and D and E shall be subject to written apology in accordance with Article 17(1)1 of the School Violence Prevention Act.

F In accordance with the above decision, the F was consulted by an expert from July 23, 2013 to February 28, 2014, and the Plaintiff paid F’s guardian the sum of KRW 1,722,000 for the psychological treatment costs for F.

2. Determination

A. As seen earlier in determining the cause of the claim, victim F was provided with psychological treatment according to the determination of the above autonomous committee, and the Plaintiff borne the above medical expenses on behalf of the Defendants, who are the aggressor student D and E’s guardian. As such, the Plaintiff may exercise the right to indemnity against the Defendants pursuant to Article 16(6) of the School Violence Prevention Act.

(c).