A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2014, the Defendant did not obtain a driver's license at around 14:30 on April 14, 201, and operated the B-to-pur vehicle from Seongbuk-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul to the 189 front-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (report on confirmation of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of penalty, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances, etc. considered favorable to the reasons for sentencing):

1. Probation and lecture attendance order shall be decided as per the Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more;

The reason for sentencing is that there are many kinds of records that the defendant was punished for drunk driving or unlicensed driving, and in 2009, the defendant had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years in the 8th month of imprisonment due to unlicensed driving, etc., but there is also an inevitable circumstance that the crime of this case is committed and the corresponding punishment is punished accordingly.

However, it appears that the defendant is able to repent his mistake in depth, that the defendant exceeded a licenseless driving and does not reach a personnel accident, that the defendant did not commit the same crime since he was punished as mentioned above in 2009 and no longer committed the same crime until the crime in this case, and that the defendant seems to be working as a caregiver after he was retired from his bar business from February 2014, and the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relation, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined by taking full account of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case.