1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 1, 2013, Defendant B, while under the influence of alcohol around 21:00, went to the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Dnonom Bank” along with the same fees, and Defendant B met and danced the Plaintiff from singinging the Plaintiff.

However, in the process, Defendant B complained of pains by assaulting the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Defendant B’s assault”), thereby resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the third sub-branch salt (Initial Injury), the complex sub-complosion, or a chronic pain equivalent to the minimum of this (hereinafter “explosion”).

B. After three days from the time of Defendant B’s assault, the Plaintiff was diagnosed only the “Nemane Zone 3 in the right side requiring two weeks’ treatment”, and was subject to an agreement with Defendant B on March 8, 2013 based on the said diagnosis. However, the Plaintiff filed a claim for damages against Defendant B by filing a lawsuit against the Defendant B on July 1, 2016 (hereinafter “relevant civil case”), which was partially quoted in the appellate court on July 1, 2016, and the final appeal by Defendant B was dismissed on September 30, 2016 (see Supreme Court Decision 2016Da31497), and the said judgment became final and conclusive thereafter.

C. The part which accepted the plaintiff's assertion and claim in related civil cases is as follows.

(1) In a situation where it is difficult for the Plaintiff to accurately confirm the scope of damage caused by Defendant B’s assault, the Plaintiff received 5 million won and agreed to the Plaintiff’sbuster on the basis of only two weeks’ right-hand 3 sub-section salt, which the Plaintiff received at the time, based on the diagnosis results.

However, after the agreement of this case, the plaintiff continued to give a handout, unlike the previous diagnosis, and his handouts, and the handouts and body spreads to the degree that it is impossible to lead a daily life. In the end, the plaintiff was designated as a national basic livelihood recipient by undergoing the diagnosis of the combined handouts and the combined handouts.

Until now, it has been.